Question not found.

3

How true is it that Jesus received 39 lashes, representing the 39 diseases known in His time?

If this is true, does this mean that healing was made available now for New Testament believers?

Clarify Share Report Asked July 22 2014 Mini michelle macon Supporter

Community answers are sorted based on votes. The higher the vote, the further up an answer is.

5
Image41 Ezekiel Kimosop Supporter
Nowhere in Scripture is it recorded that Jesus received 39 lashes of the whip but the Bible does record that Jesus was scourged and that he physically suffered for our sins. There are other forms of suffering he underwent including rejection by his people. Then the thorns placed on his head, nails driven through his hands and legs and being speared on his side. These too are no less significant than lashes.

Some commentators claim that a condemned criminal was normally given a certain number of lashes but scripture does not mention the number of lashes or scourging in regard to the crucifixion of Jesus. The 39 lashes claim is therefore difficult to reconcile with Scripture (See John 19:1, Mark 5:15, Matthew 27:26).

The purpose of Jesus' sufferings is clearly captured by a number of messianic prophecies. For example, Isaiah 53:5 (KJV) says, "But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed."

There is also no scripture evidence that the lashes received by Christ each represented some known number of diseases that afflicted humanity in His time. If anything, Jesus died for the greatest human disease that man could ever suffer. This is the depravity of sin and the need for redemption from condemnation and eternal separation from God. This is perhaps the principal purpose for which Jesus died. 

Some Bible teachers take Isaiah 53:5 out of its passage context and tie it to physical infirmities and diseases when in fact our spiritual infirmity underlies the theological basis for Christ's suffering and death. The shedding of his atoning blood was meant to cleanse our Adamic sin (a theological infirmity in itself) and to usher us into a new spiritual dimension where we are reconciled with God forever (Romans 5:8). There can be no greater healing than the redemption of the human soul.

The healing introduced by Jesus is therefore spiritual in nature. It restores the wholesomeness of our life in Christ. The Hebrew word "raw-faw" (rapha) for "healed" is a compound word that broadly conveys the wholesomeness of God's healing. Physical healing could not have been in contemplated in this context given that the writer was speaking about the redemptive works of the Messiah. 

Even if believers suffer from or die of an earthly disease or from any other cause, their relationship with God will not be affected in any way. This is not to suggest that God does not heal our physical sicknesses. It underscores the significance of the Christ's atoning works and anchors them in their appropriate theological perspective.

July 23 2014 3 responses Vote Up Share Report


3
Mini Irene Petree Supporter
I don't believe that Pilate was thinking of the amount of known diseases when he sentenced Jesus. That's symbolic conjecture. Scripture doesn't say how many stripes Jesus received. It is ASSUMED that he was given 39 because it was customary to give 40 lashes minus one (or 39). It was called 40 lashes minus one because it was assumed that 40 or more lashes would kill someone. They were whipped with a cat of nine tails (a whip with nine lashings embedded with bits of metal or bone).

An old Roman law/tradition that said forty lashes were a death sentence. In Roman times, it was deemed that if a flogger were to appropriately administer a punishment, he should be able to kill a man with forty lashes. Depending on the circumstances, if he failed to kill a man in forty lashes, the flogger would face death. This was to insure that the flogger would not hold back in meting out the punishment. Using this same warped twisted logic, the Romans determined that 39 lashes shouldn't kill a person so that was the most you could give a person, without a sentence of death by flogging. 

Flogging is the only punishment mentioned in the Bible as a standard punishment. The maximum number of strokes to be administered in any one case is 40 (Deut. 25:3). The understanding is that the number of strokes was to be determined in each individual case according to the gravity of the offense and the limit was to prevent death by flogging.

July 23 2014 1 response Vote Up Share Report


2
Stringio Joseph Turner Supporter Christian, Sunday School Teacher, Actor, Health Food Worker
Based off of what I'm familiar with from Scripture, it's not likely at all. The only mention of Jesus being flogged is from Matthew 27:26. The netbible.org commentary on the matter says thus:

"The Greek term φραγελλόω (fragellow) refers to flogging. BDAG 1064 s.v. states, “flog, scourge, a punishment inflicted on slaves and provincials after a sentence of death had been pronounced on them. So in the case of Jesus before the crucifixion…Mt 27:26; Mk 15:15.”

A Roman flogging (traditionally, “scourging”) was an excruciating punishment. The victim was stripped of his clothes and bound to a post with his hands fastened above him (or sometimes he was thrown to the ground). Guards standing on either side of the victim would incessantly beat him with a whip (flagellum) made out of leather with pieces of lead and bone inserted into its ends. While the Jews only allowed 39 lashes, the Romans had no such limit; many people who received such a beating died as a result. See C. Schneider, TDNT, 515-19."

So, you see, Jesus was flogged by the Romans, not the Jews. The Jews had a limit of 39 because they believed that 40 would kill a man. Paul himself mentions in 2 Corinthians 11:24 that he received from the Jews the "40 lashes minus one", emphasizing his sufferings for Christ and how close a companion to death he was.

July 23 2014 0 responses Vote Up Share Report


0
Mini Bryan Allen Supporter
Isaiah 53:5 refers to spiritual infirmities; yes, that's true, but it also applies to our physical infirmities as well.

(Matthew 8:15-17) And he touched her hand, and the fever left her: and she arose, and ministered unto them.When the evening was come, they brought unto him many that were possessed with devils: and he cast out the spirits with his word, and healed all that were sick, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying, "He Himself took our infirmities, and bare our sicknesses."

Here we see Isaiah 53:5 being fulfilled. All that were sick were healed. And a fever is a natural infirmity. The spirit doesn't experience a fever, the body does.

(Psalms 103:3) Who forgiveth all thine iniquities; who healeth all thy diseases.

8 days ago 0 responses Vote Up Share Report


Add your Answer

All answers are REVIEWED and MODERATED.
Please ensure your answer MEETS all our guidelines.

What makes a good answer? ▼

A good answer provides new insight and perspective. Here are guidelines to help facilitate a meaningful learning experience for everyone.

  1. Adhere to the eBible Statement of Faith.
  2. Your answer should be complete and stand-alone.
  3. Include supporting arguments, and scripture references if possible. Seek to answer the "why".
  4. Adhere to a proper tone and spirit of love and understanding.
  5. For more info see The Complete Guide to eBible
Header
  1. 4000 characters remaining